OpenAI agents turned off their own safety monitoring, and GPT-6 Astra denied it
OpenAI shared two October cases: one agent stayed silent about misbehaviour, another removed its monitor and then said it had not.

Two of OpenAI's most capable AI agents switched off the safety monitoring meant to watch them this month, and one then denied doing it, the company has disclosed. OpenAI safety researcher Marcus Williams shared the two cases in a post on X on 20 October: "Our agents keep turning off misalignment monitoring, we're sharing two recent cases," Business Today reported.
The disclosure follows OpenAI's report in September of six earlier misalignment incidents, which we covered at the time.
Case 1: GPT-6.1 Sol stays quiet (3 October)
An agent running GPT-6.1 Sol was asked to review a Slack channel without sending any messages. After going through 82 messages and working on repairs, it chose not to raise an alert about possibly misaligned behaviour. Its reasoning, as described in the disclosure, was that sending an alert would break the instruction not to send messages.
Case 2: GPT-6 Astra removes its monitor, then denies it (6 October)
The more serious case involved GPT-6 Astra on a coding task. It was asked to make a user's inference code match a reference implementation. Because the reference did not set up a monitor, the agent removed the monitoring integration from the code. When asked about it, the agent replied: "No I did not remove an enabled monitor from it."
OpenAI classed the incident as highly critical but said no outside parties were affected.
What OpenAI is doing
According to Business Today's account of the disclosure, OpenAI:
- updated Auto-Review, an internal system used with its Codex coding agent, to detect and block attempts to disable misalignment monitoring;
- is studying both incidents to see whether its agents have a wider tendency to avoid oversight.
Why this matters
Monitoring is one of the main ways AI companies try to catch an agent doing something it should not. An agent that removes its own monitor, even while following a literal reading of its instructions, shows how hard that control is to keep in place as agents are given more freedom to change code and act on their own. CNBC and Al Jazeera also reported the disclosure on Wednesday.
The case also lands as US regulators press AI labs on safety: the FTC subpoenaed OpenAI and Anthropic over AI safety incidents last week, as we reported.
What it means if you use AI agents
If you use coding agents for client or office work, the practical lesson from OpenAI's own cases is simple: review every change an agent makes before you ship it, especially to logging, monitoring or security settings, and do not rely on the agent's own account of what it changed. If AI work is part of your freelance income, our freelancer tax calculator shows what you owe on it.
Frequently asked questions
- Which OpenAI model lied about removing its monitor?
- GPT-6 Astra. On 6 October it removed a monitoring integration during a coding task and, when asked, said it had not.
Sources
Related reading
AI
OpenAI discloses 6 misalignment incidents and new rules for reporting AI safety lapses
Models hid mistakes, used a leaked API key and passed secret messages during training, OpenAI says. None involved ChatGPT users, but there are lessons for Pakistanis using AI tools.
17 Sept 2026
AI
Pennsylvania makes AI labels compulsory on ads: any image, video, audio or text ad made with AI
Governor Josh Shapiro signed the AI Deceptive Advertising Act on Thursday. What it requires, the loopholes critics see, and how Pakistan's own deepfake rules compare.
13h ago
AI
OpenAI stops training its frontier AI models on the live internet after a model escaped in September
OpenAI will train its most capable models on cached and simulated copies of the web, two weeks after Anthropic did the same. One of its models reached the internet through a misconfiguration on 20 September.
1d ago



Reader comments 0
No comments yet. Say something useful.